Saturday, November 19, 2011

Back in the Passenger's Seat

This fall I decided to take a class at my temple on "Basic Judaism". Now, I know a lot about Jewish cooking, Jewish American culture, and the Jewish Experience from a historical perspective. I could tell you all about the condition of Jewish Women in 15th century Hamburg, but damned if I could tell you much about the history of the Hebrews, classical Judaism, or the Torah. I like the rabbi who was signed up to be the instructor and figured it would be a good way for me to meet some folks and learn something in the process (by which I mean, "leave the house for something more than just a work out, change out of my PJs and interact with someone other than L).

In just two weeks I've learned a lot of content regarding the Reform Jewish approach to the Torah (which really can be summed up in Hillel's famous words "That which is despicable to you, do not do to your fellow, this is the whole Torah, and the rest is commentary"), and the history of the development of the written Torah and the Hebrew people prior to the common era.


But, even more important, I've learned what it is to be a student again in a class about a subject I don't know that much about. In two meetings, I've identified some of my biggest failings as an instructor and how to fix them! Something I never would have figured out if I just kept teaching and never again sat in a student's seat (being a grad student doesn't count, undergrad classes are fundamentally different from the competition/performances that grad seminars are). Here's a few examples:


1. Begin each class with a brief discussion about what the class is going to do in that particular meeting. Even write a short outline up on the board. Empower students by showing them where the class is headed and where they should be pushing their thinking 20-30 min into discussion. Otherwise you get a situation in which the instructor "knows all" and simply "reveals" the "important" parts to the student. The well-meaning instructor puts students on the spot, trying to get them to see the connections, but this just turns into a guessing game w/ the students trying to read the instructor's mind.


By giving students a brief outline as to where you think the class should generally go, you let them start to organize their thoughts early and hopefully contribute more thoughtfully to discussion. 


2. Throwing a bunch of sources at students, having them read aloud, and then interpret on the spot (in an attempt to do something "as a class") is ineffective. It just replicates #1, but with primary sources. If you want students to interpret something, give them guideposts of specific things to look for. It will channel the discuss and provide concrete things to discuss.


2a. If you do do in-class source reading, you need to provide some context as to how the sources relate to the discussion or to one another. When on-the-spot as in a class setting, this helps tremendously in getting deeper into material, faster.


3. Pause to allow discussion. Really pause. It takes much more time to think of what to say when you'e new with the material than instructors want to allow. Pause to allow questions.


4. When students do speak, don't cut them off, even if you do so simply b/c you are excited about what they are saying. I appreciate the enthusiasm, but I don't like being silenced.


5. Those silly "introduce yourself to the class" games are essential. We didn't do it in my class and 2 weeks in I still don't know anyone as other than "the guy who talks a lot". Plus, name tags would be awesome.


6. Take your lesson plan and cut it in half. You're better off with less material that you can engage with deeply, than trying to cover "everything" but only getting 1/2 through anyway.


7. They are a pain in the ass, but designing well-formulated discussion questions (maybe 4 for a hour long meeting) are essential. I think this is easier for your own classes than for classes you TA b/c you are in charge of the material, but putting together good discussion questions and sticking to them in class can make a HUGE difference in how discussion progresses.


I have made all of these mistakes in my classes. Sometimes repeatedly. Now being in the student's position, I understand why people don't talk, what dynamics silence rather than encourage voices, and things that I can change as an instructor in order to help my own students succeed in discussion.

7 comments:

  1. I'm a firm believer in the outlining on the board before the class begins and spending 30-60 seconds running through it or the students, and I agree that preparing general/basic questions for discussion (not intricate ones, just letting things go as they go and making sure I reiterate the important points several times, in different ways, if necessary). Good point on the getting too excited about things and needing to pause more. I think any of us who like to talk/socialize could work on that more... :)

    My current German teacher is a master at that. I've been really admiring her the last two weeks. My Chinese teachers this past year were terrible, rarely correcting my mistakes and always wanting to finish sentences for me. I constantly had to interrupt them back and say "no, that is NOT what I meant. What I meant was..." and I found myself not able to finish like 75% of the time regardless. Sigh. Sign of a good language teacher (or any teacher, really) IMO is letting the student finish his/her thought before jumping in to help out - or only jumping in if the student asks for it or it's been so long it's dragging the rest of the class down consistently.

    ReplyDelete
  2. oh boy, clearly a long day for me. Sorry for the typos in that. I spoke in four languages today. And mostly not in English.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Copied, and pasted (onto my forehead).

    Thank you K!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Some really good insights there.

    With regards to pausing to allow for thinking and discussion, my sister has a trick that I haven't tried yet - but I think might be a good one.
    She says one of the hardest things to do as an instructor is to allow for silence - silence in which students can think and come up with answers. It always feels like the silence is dragging on forever, even when it's only been a few seconds.

    So her trick? Pick a song you know really well. the length of a standard pop song is about 3 minutes. After you ask a question, just start singing the song in your head, until someone raises their hand/starts answering. If you finish the song and no one has spoken up, then you interject.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've found that I have to force myself to remain very neutral during those times of pausing and of letting students finish. It is so comfortable to give signs of encouragement when someone seems on the right track, but I've found it can lead students to work to give you the answer that you want -- which is not necessarily the answer they think is right. And it can be very easy to accept the right answer without pushing to make sure there's deeper understanding there, not just clever right-answer-giving. I consciously adopt a very neutral expression[*] and try to make my "mm-hmm"s be "I hear you" not "that's right". In my experience, doing so leads to lots of students speaking up and thinking things through at the expense of getting to hear myself "teach" ;)

    [*]In grad school we called this the "Kron face" after the prof who showed us how invaluable it is while working with eager-to-succeed but poorly prepared students.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for all the thoughtful comments!

    I like the sing a song to yourself, I may try that next time I'm in the classroom. On the whole I'm really comfortable with silences. I must say that being married to an introvert has really helped me to appreciate "thinking time" and "quiet voices".

    What I find challenging at my current institution is the subtle difference between: silence-because-I'm-thinking, and silence-followed-by-awkward-shuffling-because-I-didn't-read-the-damn-book. As most of the TAs I work with can contest, silence for thinking is pretty easy to manage, but we most often deal with the later conditions of didn't-read-the-damn-book. And I'm still not sure how to deal with that problem... even threats of feeding them to the lions doesn't seem to help :)

    That being said, this week I had the experience to see modeled both highly effective and highly ineffective in-class group work. All in all, the pedagogical training I'm receiving is WAY worth the cost of the course. AND now I'm actually getting a handle on things like what TANAKH stands for. Still having to reign in some of my twitching in response to a narrative about the Jewish sonderweg, but that was to be expected (and much more of an issue when lay members from the community teach compared to the rabbis who are much more professional and historically informed).

    Whats interesting in this "adult learning" session is that the reading is VERY light (10 pages a week? maybe? with a lot of recommended material), and the dedication level is very high. It's a completely different setting than I've experienced teaching at the college level, with the exception of teaching about the Holocaust.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous8:33 AM

    Great tips, thanks! I actually like the outline feedback in my eval at Cabrillo. I started using it and really notice a difference from the students. And I totally still use the ice breaker and name tags, even though the students act like they hate it.
    I need to bookmark this page to remember these tips every couple semesters.

    PS miss you :)

    ReplyDelete