Despite being an avid technophile, I find that I am an equal devotee of the pen and paper. While I love the ability of computer-base word processing to manipulate text and image in everything from text documents to slide shows, websites, and blogs, I still often find myself drawn back to ink and paper when I'm stuck creatively. I like the regimented lines, the feel of creating letters and script, and the friction of the pen tip on a piece of paper. Cursive allows me to get my writing "on a roll" in a way that typing can never quite duplicate. Pressing a pen more firmly to paper to make a bolder line is always more visible striking than [ctrl + b], and the ability to change writing style and size in order to emphasize or diminish, as I write, is always more productive creatively.
I could not do the work I do w/o word processing programs. The mere thought of hand writing or typing a dissertation is not just unappealing but likely would have kept me out of academia all together. The ability to instantly move, create, re-create, copy and paste, save, save additional verisons, find the version you close accidentally before saving, and make infinite copies and versions, way outweighs the pleasurable sensations of a pen and paper. And new programs such as Zotero and Endnote make references painless.
But when I'm starting a project (syllabus, chapter, outline, notes), or when I'm stuck (like now), or even when I'm marking papers, nothing feels, or gets me working, better than the simple pen and paper.
 |
| wide open spaces... |
No comments:
Post a Comment